Leadership & The Capability Crisis™ — An Aside
LET’S HAVE AN HONEST CONVERSATION
Almost every discussion about the future of work asks the wrong question.
How do we protect jobs?
How do we safeguard industries?
How do we redistribute wealth?
They are all perfectly reasonable questions.
But they assume the size of the pie is fixed.
The more interesting question is:
Who is baking the next pie?
Perhaps that is the real leadership challenge of our age.
For years, I’ve found it useful to divide people into three broad groups:
Doing. Creating. Leading.
Not because one is better than another.
But because they perform fundamentally different roles.
- Doing
Most people simply do.
They turn up.
Do a job.
Receive a salary.
Go home.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Every successful organisation depends upon people who consistently deliver.
But let’s not confuse employment with creation.
Recently, a client who earns several million pounds a year said to me,
“I’m still a salary slave. I simply have a very expensive salary.”
The comment stayed with me.
I’ve met chief executives, senior partners and cabinet ministers who are exceptionally good at doing the role they inherited.
But they didn’t create the opportunity itself.
They became custodians of something someone else imagined.
I was speaking recently with a distinguished City lawyer who had just retired.
She finally had the freedom to pursue what she had always wanted to do.
Archaeology.
It made me wonder how many people spend forty years earning the right to begin living.
- Creating
This is where prosperity begins.
Not in policy papers.
Not in committees.
Not in strategy documents.
Prosperity begins the moment someone creates something another person willingly buys.
Everything else follows.
Demand creates production.
Production creates employment.
Employment creates tax revenues.
Tax revenues fund public services.
It really is that simple.
Yet I’ve attended conference after conference discussing the future of work, artificial intelligence and the economy.
Panels filled with MPs.
Ministers.
Lords.
Agency heads.
Economists.
Everyone is debating how to protect existing jobs.
Almost nobody is asking:
Who’s creating the next generation of jobs?
We’re becoming experts at discussing the distribution of wealth.
We spend far less time discussing its creation.
It sometimes feels as though Westminster is arguing endlessly about how to divide the pie while paying remarkably little attention to who is baking the next one.
The creators.
The entrepreneurs.
The innovators.
The people prepared to risk everything on an idea.
These are the engines of growth.
If we genuinely care about employment, perhaps our first responsibility is not to regulate them more effectively.
Perhaps it is to remove unnecessary friction and let them build. Take the brakes off and ‘Get out of the Way’.
- Leading
Leadership is something else again.
And this is where I believe we become confused.
Most people we call leaders are actually managers.
They are responsible for stewarding something that already exists.
There is dignity in that.
Good stewardship matters.
But stewardship and leadership are not the same thing.
True leaders create movement.
They create opportunities that didn’t previously exist.
They don’t simply allocate work.
They create work.
Then they move on and create again.
History remembers remarkably few true creators.
They rarely fit established forms.
They disturb comfortable assumptions.
They challenge accepted wisdom.
They often appear awkward, impatient or unreasonable until everyone else catches up.
Perhaps that’s why they are so frequently misunderstood.
Samuel Maverick gave his name to the English language because he refused to conform.
History tends to remember the people who change the direction of travel, not those who merely maintain it.
An Uncomfortable Thought
Every healthy society needs people who do.
Every prosperous society needs people who create.
Every successful civilisation needs people capable of leading.
The tragedy is that we increasingly celebrate stewardship while making creation unnecessarily difficult.
We admire security more than courage.
Process more than progress.
Management more than imagination.
Then we wonder why growth slows.
Perhaps that is one of the defining features of The Capability Crisis™.
Not that we lack intelligence.
Not that we lack ambition.
But we have become less certain about how to recognise, encourage and develop the capabilities that create tomorrow’s opportunities.
Because the future will not be built by people asking how to divide a diminishing pot.
It will be built by people with the imagination and courage to create a bigger one.
Summary:
- We’ve built an economy that spends most of its time arguing about how to divide the pie. Very little time asking who is baking the next one.
- Everyone in Westminster seems to be arguing about how to protect a diminishing pot. Nobody seems particularly interested in creating a bigger one.
- How many people making economic policy have ever had to create a payroll?
- True leaders create things for others to do, then step back and create more opportunities.
- Perhaps the larger question we need to address is:
Do we want the kind of society that rewards the capabilities that create prosperity, or one that quietly discourages them?
Neil Tuson is exploring The Capability Crisis™
Why people, organisations and societies increasingly struggle, not because they lack intelligence, but because the capabilities required to create progress are rarely recognised, deliberately developed or consistently rewarded.
Character. Capability. Clarity.
If you would like to talk about this, you can book a call here: https://calendly.com/perfectteams/book-your-perfect-teams-diagnostic-call
Neil Tuson
London July 13th, 2026
Article by: